Where are the WMD's?
The title of this post is the question that keeps coming up, where are the weapons of mass destruction? Were there really any? If you have half a brain you know that yes there were weapons of mass destruction. Just ask the Kurds. In this post I am going to prove that 1. there are WMD's and 2. where they are right at this very moment. I will have some help however from 1. a Lebanese journalism agency and 2. the former Iraqi republican guard general 2nd in command behind Soddam himself! My word will be in grey and any other will be in red.
The first will be from General Georges Sada a former general of the Iraqi rebublican guard and 2nd in command to Saddam had a sit down interview with the The New York Sun. If you would like to see proof of this interview go to nysun.com. (because of size the interview has been broken into portions)
"There are WMD gone out of Iraq to Syria and they must be found and returned to safe hands" Mr. Sada said. "I am confident they were taken over."
Mr. Sada, 65, that the pilots of the two airlines that transported the WMD's to Syria approached him in the middle of 2004, after Saddam was captured by American troops. The pilots told Mr. Sada that two Iraqi Airways boeings were converted to cargo planes by taking out the seats, Mr. Sada said. Then Special Republican Guard brigades loaded materials onto the planes, he said, including "yellow barrels with skull and crossbones on each barrel." The pilots said there was also a ground convoy of trucks.
The flights- 56 in total, Mr. Sada said- attracted little notice because they were thought to be civilian flights providing relief from Iraq to Syria, which had suffered a flood after a dam collapse in June of 2002.
"Saddam realized, this time, that the Americans were coming," Mr. Sada said. "They handed over the WMD's to the Syrians."
Mr. Sada said that the Iraqi official responsible for transferring the weapons was a cousin of Saddam Husseins named Ali Hussein al-Majid, known as "Chemical Ali". The Syrian official responsible for recieving them was a cousin of Bashaar Assad who is known variously as General Abu Ali, Abu Himma, or Zulhimawe.
I thinkI've heard that name before, "Chemical Ali". Ring any bells? The next statement is for you liberal troop haters that think we are oppressers!
He thanked the American troops. "They liberated this country and the nation. It is a liberation force. They did a great job", he said. "We are freed."
Sada has a book called Saddam's Secrets and in this book he states,
On the eve of the first Gulf War, Saddam was planning to use his air force to launch a chemical weopans attack on Israel.
Syria is one of only eight countries that has not signed the Chemical Weopans Convention, a treaty that obligates countries not to stockpile or the use of chemical weopons. Syria's chemical warfare program, apart from any weopans that may have been recieved from Iraq, has long been the source concern of America, Israel, and Lebanon. In March 2004 the director of the Central Intelligence, George Tenet, testified before the Senate Armed Services Commitee, saying, "Damascus has an active CW development and testing program that relies on foreign suppliers for key controlled chemicals suitable for CW."
Mr. Sada is now a converted Muslim to Christianity and is the head of operations with the humanitarian organization, Word Compassion, in the Iraqi division.
I sure hope that was proof enough of WMD's. Liberals you are right that they are not in Iraq because they are in Syria! Why do you think the gates of Baghdad closed shut every time the UN tried to investigate? Do you think Hussein just wanted some nap time?
The next proof of WMD's in Syria is from Nizar Nayuf, a Syrian journalist who recently defected from Syria to westren Europe and is known for bravely chanllenging the Syrian regime, said in a letter to a Dutch newspaper on Monday, January the 5th. He told the newspaper "De Telegraaf", that he knows of three sites where Iraq's WMD's are kept. The three places are: (my words in greyall other in blue)
1. Tunnels dug under the town of al- Baida near the city of Hama in Northeren Syria. These tunnels are an integral part of an underground factory, built by the North Koreans, for producing Syrian scud missiles. Iraqi chemical weopans and long- ranged missiles are stored in these tunnels.
2. The village of Tal Snan, north of the town of Salamija, where there is a big Syrian air force camp. Vital parts of the WMD's are stored there.
3. The city of Sjinsjar on the Syrian border with Lebanon, south of Homs city.
Nayouf writes that the transfer of weopans was organized by the commanders of the Republican Guard, including General Shalish with the help of Assif Shoakat the cousin of Bashar Assad. Shoakat is the CEO of Bhaha an import/export company owned by the Assad family.
In February of 2003 just before the American invasion in Iraq, very few are aware of the efforts to bring WMD's into Syria, and the personal involvement of Bashar Asaad and his family operations.
Nizar wrote to an anonymous Syrian source that wrote letters to him disclosing the WMD locations. Because of size I will not post the letters but please take a second and Go to http://www.2la.org/syria/iraq-wmd.php
to read Nayouf's letters and to see a Satellite photo of where the locations are.
There are WMD's and Syria is a very dangerous threat! We need to be very worried about them and what they could do. We know that Hezbollah and Syria have tight relationships (see UN security resolution 1559) and Hezbollah could very well have some of these weopons by now. How do you think Hezbollah had those devastating scud missiles that they fired at Israel. They got them from Syria. Syria is threat not because of they themselves using the WMD's but they harbor and will supply terrorists!
As general Sada put it our boys are liberators my friends and we need to support them in every way. The worst thing Bush ever did was lie about that there were no WMD's on false intelligence. That was where President Bush lied. There where and there are WMD's and he knew it but the Democrat pit bulls wouldn't stop biting until he said that and guess what they're still biting!
We need to take a stand! Liberals you need to join us or get out of the way!
Big Jimmy
P.S. Redefeat Communism in 2008, vote against Hillary!
King Crusader, signing out.
(Comment this)
I am the #1TerroristHunter and i aprove this message. (Comment this)
ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS WHY DIDN'T WE LISTEN TO MACARTHUR!!! (Comment this)
This blog will be the last thing on our minds if China starts a war with us.
King Crusader, signing out. (Comment this)
Big Jimmy - North Korea having nukes scares the hell out of you, but India, Pakistan, China, Mother Russia, Israel, and US doesn’t bother you? Nor does the fact that 99% of all containers coming into ports in this country are not checked for biological or nuclear substances? (Comment this)
To be brutally honest I believe that nukes are terrible. It will ruin this world and already has begun to do so. But because there here we cannot get rid of them, so we have to take out the people that will use them wrongly which is basically every country but the US and Israel. (Comment this)
I'm assuming you missed typed and meant to say why aren't we bombing Syria. Truly I do believe we should start. If the gov't can prove 100% there in Syria we'll be going in and if we do find them and prove to liberals all over the world we have them, lets just say Republican '08 and Bush's approval rating will sky rocket.
Now to say that we were in Iraq soley for WMD's is an ignorant thing to say. We declared a war on terror. Suddam was a terrorist and one that was gaining more and more power every day, he needed to be taken out regardless of WMD's.
Besides ask the kurds and veterans of desert storm 1 if he had WMD's. I think we both know what their answers would be. (Comment this)
"ALL Islamofascist countries you cannot trust with nukes because they will use them to utterly destroy other countries and cripple them" I believe this is what you are advocating we do? If you are truly worried about nuclear proliferiation, why not push for all (including the the US) to sign the treaty banning such weapons?
AND
"Now to say that we were in Iraq soley for WMD's is an ignorant thing to say."
WMD's is exactly the reason we were given for invading Iraq, there have been dozens since, but that was the initial reason given for invading Iraq - Cheney's mushroom cloud ring a bell? The war on terror was in Afgahnastan- which we cut and ran from. (Comment this)
Now to answer the other part of your comment, do you believe the only terrorists out there were the ones that ran planes into the twin towers from al-queda? I certainly hope you are not that ignorant. WMD's was a big reason we are in Iraq but not the only reason. They make and harbor terrorists so therefore they are a terrorist run country which had to be taken out regardless of WMD's. I personally would have felt it perfectly justifiable if we had gone into Iraq and knew nothing about their WMD's. They are terrorists, and we have a war on terrorism! (Comment this)
WHAT IS WITH YOU LIBS WHO THINK WE CUT AND RAN FROM AFGANISTAN?? We are STILL there!! And if you sincerely believe Saddam did not at least fund terror, you are an ignoramus. Plus, they had weapons of mass destruction and were testing them on the kurds!! Plus, although I agree, WMD's were the #1 reason for going into Iraq, taking Saddam out was always mentioned as the number 2, so don't say that there was only one reason for going into Iraq.
King Crusader, signing off. (Comment this)
We certainly did cut and run from Afgahanstan and the Taliban is now so entrenched in the country that we have to cut deals with them because we don't have the troops to force them out.
Any rogue group that wants to bring this country to it's knees will do so economically, not with brute force. A couple dirty bombs in the dreadfully unprotected major shipping ports of this country and we are toast.
You also fail to see the economic control that China has over this country. They have the fastest growing economy, are locking up all the major oil contracts to fuel that economy, and they hold the notes for our huge deficit. It won't be another country that fires the first shot in WWIII, we will be forced to.
Fanatical religous beliefs and ignorance are a deadly combination - and you two posses both.
(Comment this)
The following should answer your questions about terrorism in Iraq.
here is the web address http://www.cfr.org/publication/9513/#1
Has Iraq sponsored terrorism?
Yes. Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship provided headquarters, operating bases, training camps, and other support to terrorist groups fighting the governments of neighboring Turkey and Iran, as well as to hard-line Palestinian groups. During the 1991 Gulf War, Saddam commissioned several failed terrorist attacks on U.S. facilities. Prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the State Department listed Iraq as a state sponsor of terrorism. The question of Iraq’s link to terrorism grew more urgent with Saddam’s suspected determination to develop weapons of mass destruction (WMD), which Bush administration officials feared he might share with terrorists who could launch devastating attacks against the United States.
What type of terrorist groups did Iraq support under Saddam Hussein’s regime?
Primarily groups that could hurt Saddam’s regional foes. Saddam has aided the Iranian dissident group Mujahedeen-e-Khalq and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (known by its Turkish initials, PKK), a separatist group fighting the Turkish government. Moreover, Iraq has hosted several Palestinian splinter groups that oppose peace with Israel , including the mercenary Abu Nidal Organization, whose leader, Abu Nidal, was found dead in Baghdad in August 2002. Iraq has also supported the Islamist Hamas movement and reportedly channeled money to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. A secular dictator, however, Saddam tended to support secular terrorist groups rather than Islamist ones such as al-Qaeda, experts say.
So anonymous why do you wish to remain ignorant? Is it your liberal bias? Are you so blinded to actually believe Suddam kept terrorist out of Iraq? Just to clue you in, HE was a terrorist!
That comment that we don't see the control China has over this country is also ignorant. Ever since Clinton yes good 'ole Billy boy opened up free trade with China we have done nothing but close shop! We need to break off all relations with China and start making things ourselves and yes that means make a friggen huge wall across the border of Mexico also!
Now I love it when liberals can't think of anything else to say so they attack your beliefs. 1. Are calling us fanatics because we're Christians? 2. If we were moslem would you be calling us fanatics or would that be politically incorrect? Sir you are very confused and very very ignorant. Its ignorant to call us ignorant when all we do is support what we say with facts! And to calls us fanatics when we have barely mentioned our beliefs is also ignorant! You want me to get fanatical do ya! YOU WILL NOT DESTROY MY GENERATION, YOU WILL NOT DESTROY THIS COUNTRY , AND YOU WILL NOT MOCK MY GOD! Start mocking my God and my beliefs and the more "fanatical" I'll get. So get your facts straight you ignorant liberal! (Comment this)
Religious fanatic - not because of your religion, but because of your lack of tolerance for other religions.
Providing "facts" means nothing if the proof has no validitity. (Comment this)
What do you think tolerence is?
John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
Is the Bible tolerant?
Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
How can I be tolerant when the Bible teaches me that there is only one way to heaven and that is through Jesus Christ my Lord and Savior?
You are right facts mean nothing to those who don't want to hear them. (Comment this)
"How can I be tolerant when the Bible teaches me that there is only one way to heaven and that is through Jesus Christ my Lord and Savior?" How do you know this to be correct? I'm sure the Taliban, the Muslims, the Jewish, the Buddist and others all believe their way is the one and true way.
"You are right facts mean nothing to those who don't want to hear them." On this we both agree, but from different perspectives.
One final thought - if you truly look at what this country calls democracy and what the Russians and Chinese call socialism or communism, I think you find very little difference between them. (Comment this)
Now about me proving that the Bible is correct, 1. you are going to believe what you want to believe and no matter what I say about this issue are you going to agree with 2.you mentioned the Taliban and Moslems as two different religions or beliefs but the Taliban is moslem, which is a perfect example of why the Islamic religion is totally satanic! Read King Crusader's post A Religion of True Hate to see what I mean. The Koran states that all infidels or unconverted people must be conquered. The history of Islam is very flawed also. For one no one group of Islamics can actually agree on anything and hate each other just as much as they hate Christians. Islam is built upon hate, as with Christianity is built upon love. Alah asks his followers to die for him to achieve salvation, Christ died for us so that His followers will be able to spend eternity with Him in heaven. Muhammad historically is stated as being dillusive and insane. His own aunt one time said that she was sure he was possessed by a demon! The Bible has never been disproved in any area ever. The author C.S. Lewis tried and ended up becoming a Christian because he realized it can't be disproved. Thats how you know something is truth or not, can it be disproved.
The Jews are God's chosen people and are very precious in His sight but they have turned their back on Him and have gone their own way. You can look at Christianity as being fulfilled Judaism meaning the Jews believe that the prophecies of the Old Testament have not been fulfilled and that the Messaiah has not come when actually they missed him.
Isaiah 9:16 For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed.
The Jews will come back to Him though:
Isaiah 10:21 The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto the mighty God.
The following is different prophecies in the OT that are fulfilled in the NT.
First Prediction: (His birth in Bethlehem)
Old Testament Prediction: "But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of you shall come forth to Me the One to be ruler in Israel, whose going forth have been from of old from everlasting." (Micah 5:2).
New Testament Fulfillment: "Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold wise men from the east came to Jerusalem" (Matthew 2:1).
Second Prediction: (He would be preceded by a messenger)
Old Testament Prediction: "The voice of one crying in the wilderness: `Prepare the way of the Lord; make straight in the desert a highway for our God;'" (Isaiah 40:3).
New Testament Fulfillment: "In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea saying, "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!;" (Matthew 3:1,2).
Third Prediction: (He would enter Jerusalem on a colt)
Old Testament Prediction: "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold your King is coming to you; He is just and having salvation, lowly and riding on a donkey, a colt, the foal of a donkey" (Zechariah 9:9).
New Testament Fulfillment: "Then they brought him to Jesus. And they threw their own garments on the colt, and they set Jesus on him. And as he went, they spread their clothes on the road" (Luke 19:35-36).
Fourth Prediction: (He would be betrayed by a friend)
Old Testament Prediction: "Even my own familiar friend in whom I trusted, who ate my bread, Has lifted up his heel against me" (Psalm 41:9).
New Testament Fulfillment: "And while He was still speaking, behold Judas, one of the twelve, with great multitude with swords and clubs, came from the chief priests and elders of the people. Now His betrayer had given them a sign saying, "Whomever I kiss, He is the One; seize Him; " (Matthew 26:47,48).
Fifth Prediction: (His hand and feet pierced)
Old Testament Prediction: "For dogs have surrounded Me; The assembly of the wicked has enclosed Me. They pierced My hands and My feet." (Psalm 22:16).
New Testament Fulfillment: "And when they had come to the place called Calvary, there they crucified Him, and the criminals, one on the right hand and the other on the left." (Luke 23:33).
Sixth Prediction: (He would be wounded by His enemies)
Old Testament Prediction: "But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities" (Isaiah 53:5).
New Testament Fulfillment: "Then he released Barabbas to them; and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered [Him] to be crucified" (Matthew 27:26
Seventh Prediction: (His betrayal for 30 pieces of silver)
Old Testament Prediction: "Then I said to them, `If it is agreeable to you, give me my wages; and if not, refrain.' So they weighed out for my wages thirty pieces of silver'" (Zechariah 11:12).
New Testament Fulfillment: "What are you willing to give me if I deliver Him to you? And they counted out to him thirty pieces of silver" (Matthew 26:15). Note: This was predicted 500 years in advance when silver was not used for money but gold.
Eighth Prediction: (He will be spat on and beaten)
Old Testament Prediction: "I gave My back to those who struck Me, and My cheeks to those who plucked out the beard; I did not hide My face from shame and spitting" (Isaiah 50:6).
New Testament Fulfillment: "Then they spat in His face and beat Him; and others struck Him with the palm of their hands" (Matthew 26:67).
Silent in front of accusers: (Prophecy in Isaiah 53:7) Fulfilled in Matthew 27:12-14.
Crucified with thieves: (Prophecy in Isaiah 53:12) Fulfilled in Matthew 27:38.
People gamble with His garments: (Prophecy in Psalm 22:18) Fulfilled in John 19:23, 24.
His side would be pierced: (Prophesied in Zechariah 12:10) Fulfilled in John 19:34.
None of His bones would be broken: (Prophesied in Psalm 34:20) Fulfilled in John 19:33.
His body would not decay: (Prophecy in Psalm 16:10) Fulfilled in Acts 2:31.
His burial in a rich man's tomb: (Prophecy in Isaiah 53:9) Fulfilled in Matthew 27:57-60.
The darkness covering the earth: (Prophecy Amos 8:9) Fulfilled in Matthew 27:45. Note: For more on this, read the Historical Evidence section.
Note: There are 456 prophecies fulfilled in Jesus alone written in the Bible.
Friend I am praying for you so that your eyes may be lifted upon the Lord of heaven and of earth. (Comment this)
And friend I am praying for you. That your God may forgive what you and your kind have done in his name. The killing, the hatred, the hijacking of His message for personal gain and the total lack or attempt to understand another people for that is what Jesus' message was to followers.
A question for you: Do you believe the world we live in, the whole world, to be more moral and contain more true believers than the years leading up to the great flood? (Comment this)
http://www.lava.net/~hcssc/godlessmoney.html (Comment this)
Now your going way, way off. Who have we killed in God's name? Who do we hate? If your are refering to absolute right and wrong that is not hating. How have we "hijacked" His message for personal gain? Jesus' message to His followers was go into all the world and preach the good news of salvation.
To answer your last question: yes and no. Is there more true believers, yes, for God said that Noah was the ONLY one that found favour in the eyes of God. No because the world will never be the slightest bit moral until Christ comes back to reign. The only way to be moral is to walk in the way of the Spirit and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh (Galatians 5:16)
Now what you seem to be supporting by the website you posted is complete seperation of Church and State. Just to let you know seperation of Church and State there is no such law, not in the constitution, not in the amendments. It is something now the liberal God hating atheists came up with so that we could take our country away from its roots. Anyways the whole purpose of the original seperation of Church and State was to remove the State out of the Church not the Church out of the State.
IN GOD WE TRUST!
Whether or not you want to admit it this country was founded on God. The liberals have made it so you can worship every other god than the ONE true God. Can Christians pray in school? Can Moslems? (Comment this)
Ok - Morals - Lying - Bush admin on Iraq, Bush admin on Katrina response, Bush Admin on outing of Valarie Plame, etc
Killing - the thousands that have died in Iraq because of the lying from #1 above, for the control of Iraq Oil, for military bases with which to strike other Middle Eastern countries.
Stealing - No bid goverment contracts for Haliburton and KBR. Looting by American Soldiers in Iraq.
"Anonymous politicians as a whole are corrupt, the very system of politics is totally and completely corrupted on BOTH sides demecrats and republicans." If you believe this, then how come your moral outrage was directed President Clinton along?
As for Jesus' message, he "loved" all peoples even those who crusified him. He refused to strike out in violence against those who threatened him - and you? (Comment this)
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/20061107_olbermann_weighs_in_on_elections/ (Comment this)
God Bless You
Find the Truth,
Jeremy (Comment this)
How can you say there is no abosolute right and wrong? What crapped out world do you live in. If thats the main thing you have against Christianity, then I'm sorry but all that does is prove that you can't come up with nothing against it besides you can't stand it that man is evil. Again, I'll pray for you, I'm not kidding I seriously am.
lying-The Bush admin. never lied on Iraq. If your saying its because of the whole WMD thing your wrong because this war is called: Operation Iraqi Freedom. Not Operation Get WMD's. I don't even see where your coming from on the whole Katrina disaster. 1. How can you blame a natural disaster on a President? 2. The federal gov't is not allowed to intercede until a state of emergency is called. Mayor Ray Nagen(D) never called a state of emergency until after the whole thing happened, if Nagen called a state of emergency before it happened we would have had troops, fema, etc. all ready to come in until that call is made it is up to the state. You are right Christ LOVED all people but that does not mean that those people still won't go to hell. He loves everyone but only those who accept His salvation will be in heaven. You are right Christ never striked out at the people who crusified him but what about when He went into the temple and flipped out on all the money collectors? Christ knew He had to go to the cross for that was the only way salvation could be provided.
Killing- What is war? Were not playing paintball here! (although thats what John Kerry would rather have our troops use) How can you possibly say that this war is for oil? If it was for oil then why aren't we getting any? Why is gas not below a dollar? Roughly 2300 men have died in this war. Did you know that over 6000 men were dying a day in WW2? Was WW2 worthless, if you say yes please get a plane ticket to France.
stealing- I can't believe you are making a blind ignorant accusation at our troops, the very troops that make it alright for us to be talking on this site! Are you against our troops?
The reason my outrage is directed at Clinton is because he is the flippin president of the US and he goes and cheats on his wife with one of his coworkers and then lies about it! How can you support such a man? The same goes for Foley and the others on both parties, they all need to go! Again, its simply because liberals still uphold Clinton as one of the best presidents ever when the same thing happens in the Republican party (ex. Foley, Shurman) and they lose their jobs and are shunned upon.
That site you sent me too is rediculous, its pure propaganda. If you look at it its just a different camera view. Look in the pictures, right below that huge Mission Accomplished banner on the top of the ship is the backdrop of that video on that site. Why did you have to stoop that low to prove nothing? And how come when we prove you wrong on something you change the subject? (i.e. Iraq was not a terrorist nation, cutting and running from Afghanistan) Oh wait I'm mistaken, you did reply to that. You said facts don't mean anything. Thats right, I remember now.
You asked:
Are you 100% behind the war in Iraq? I am 99.9% behind the war in Iraq. Reason being because I feel that Iraq will never be able to govern themselves and right when we leave, it will turn back to a dictatorship. Thats why I feel if we just pull out we will be leaving the people high and dry.
The democrats (and you) say we "cut and run" from Afghanistan (how could we have cut and run if we still have troops there) but is that not what the democrats want us to do in Iraq, an immediate pull out? Would that not be cutting and running? Flip, Flops will never get anyone anywhere, and that is why the people of the United States elected Bush over Kerry. Bush not only won the electoral college he won the popular vote with 50.7% of the majority.
(Comment this)
1) I didn’t say there is no absolute right or wrong, what I said is that I don’t buy into the claim that Christianity has the market cornered on absolute right and wrong. Especially since they have been wrong, with their absolute right and wrong, so many times before. My only beef with Christianity is their belief that they know all and what they say goes. The same I have with most religions.
2)Lying - I'm not going to rehash this issue. The bottom line is that congress was told we needed to invade Iraq because of WMD's - try a little research on this one.
3)Katrina - again, not worth trying to show you the truth if you don't want to hear it. There is a video out there shot during a meeting with Bush and Fema and others where they are trying to figure out they are going to spin the lack of action. And if the federal gov't can go into another country when they deem in neccessary, they certainly can move help into one of our states. They didn't even have the neccessary manpower and equipment staged and ready to go and there was a four day warning.I don't blame the gov't for the natural disaster, I blame them for the lack of action and then trying to cover it up.
4)"You are right" (Thank you) "Christ LOVED all people but that does not mean that those people still won't go to hell. He loves everyone but only those who accept His salvation will be in heaven. You are right" (Thank you) " Christ never striked out at the people who crusified him but what about when He went into the temple and flipped out on all the money collectors? " I never said anything about who goes to Hell and who doesn't - but do you know for a fact that anyone has gone to Hell? Tipping over the tax collectors tins is bit less than "In conjunction with the South Korean Airforce, bomb (not with nukes), bomb, and bomb until the major cities and bases of North Korea are dust."
5)Killing - A)We wouldn't be at war if Bush didn't lie to get us into one, which the neo-con where planning long before 9/11 (this is fact). Tens of thousands of "collateral damage". Those who didn't make it out of the Torture camps, etc
6)Changing the subject - I have not turned away from Iraq not being a terrorist nation prior to our invasion. Saddam was terrorist to his country men, but the global terrorists, the ones who attacked us, were not in Iraq and were avowed enemies of Iraq. We have cut and run from Afgahnastan, we can even rout out the Taliban - we have to make deals with them. And what I said about facts was that supporting claims that are incorrect are not facts - learn to read.
7)If you are 99.9% behind this war, then I assume your posting from Iraq or somewhere in the middle east and are a member of our armed forces? Or do you not believe in it that much that you would make the ultimate sacrifice to protect God's country from the Satanic Islamfacists?
8)The neo-con talking point of "flip/flop" has lost all credibility. Unless Bushes statement of "I never said stay the course" was a failed joke.
9)One final point Mr. GPA, Bush did not win 50.7% of the majority - you can't win a percentage of the majority. 50.7% is a majority - however slim but still a majority. Considering only 30% of eligiable voters actually voted, that means that Bush actually had support from about 25% of the voting population (of the votes that the were allowed to be counted) - hardly a majority.
Ok one more final point "The Bible" written after the fact and translated from 30 or more languages through the years) "establishes absolute right and wrong." I do believe there is an absolute right and wrong - just not what modern day religious radicals believe it to be.
"How can you be absolutely sure that there is no "absolute right and wrong"?" Be careful with this one, your whole religion is based on a leap of faith. (Comment this)
1.you said: "I don’t buy into the claim that Christianity has the market cornered on absolute right and wrong. Especially since they have been wrong, with their absolute right and wrong, so many times before." What? Why do you resort to meaningless stabs? When have Christians been wrong on absolute right and wrong, something that is absolute can't change!
2. Were going to have to agree to disagree on this one because we've gone over it a couple times now and we'll just keep repeating ourselves, if you want to know what I think look through the previous comments.
3. I'll tell you again the gov't can't get involved until a State of Emergency is declared and since that was never declared until the day after it took (I do agree to long, which is not Bush's fault) a while to get everything ready.
4.You asked: but do you know for a fact that anyone has gone to Hell? Do you know for a fact that nobody has ever gone to hell? Do have to see everything to believe it? Do you know I'm real, you've never seen me.
5. Prove to me that is a fact. Because I believe you have been sucked mentally into the liberal brain washing camps.
6. I did give you perfectly valid facts!! Go to the site address I posted on that comment and see for yourself. Please don't just make things up so you can put a twist on it. And just to let you know We do not cut deals with terrorists. As much as the liberals want us to we will not do it. Remember, Jill Carol.
7. If I felt called to go into the army I most certainly would. If there was a draft I would most certainly sign up and not ask to get shipped to France so I can study, *cough* John Ferry.
8. It has not lost credibility seeing as its true and there is no way you can deny it that liberals flip/flop.
9. Sorry Mr. Perfect I misphrased that. If you would like to go back through your comments and you can see all of your spelling and grammer mistakes, so you will not be a hypocrite. Seeing as you obviously got the point I was making and understood it I won't worry to much about the misphrase.
The Bible has been translated FROM two languages: Old Testament- Hebrew, New Testamen- Greek. It has been translated TO thousands of different languages all over the world.
I am absolutely sure through my faith in Jesus Christ that there are "absolute right and wrongs", I hope you will soon find that same faith. (Comment this)
1. You implied that the Bible was less than perfectly inerrant with your statement about the translations. If you believe the Bible is wrong on some subjects, you might as well not believe it at all. If one part is wrong, God's Word lied.
II Timothy 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2.Your disregard for the absolutes of the Almighty Lord has shown you do not believe "The Way, The Truth, and The Life" (John 14:6) that me, big jimmy, and others follow.
You said " I'm sure the Taliban, the Muslims, the Jewish, the Buddist and others all believe their way is the one and true way." It really doesn't matter. If someone believes they can fly, and they jump off a tall building, they will still fall and splat at the bottom.
God is loving but not tolerant (by today's meaning). He has made things that are true and things that are false. All can come to Christ, but not all will. God has mercy on us all, so there is no reason to say such things.
I have come to the conclusion that you are an Islamochristabuddhihindu or in other words, unitarian. God says this about those of you who try to sit on the gate between truth and falsehood:
Revelation 3:16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.
God loves all people, but He is also just. If you do not follow Him in the way He has declared, He will punish you. It is the same for me as well. Before I became a Christian my heart was as dark as the rest of the unsaved. But God in His grace deigned to give me salvation.
I will pray that you come to the saving knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
King Crusader, signing off.
(Comment this)
Nice quote from the Walk In Brain blog. (Comment this)
Proverbs 10:8 The wise in heart will receive commandments: but a prating fool shall fall. (Comment this)
Did we ever say that only "corrupt liberal politicians" are twisting the word of God. No. Your putting words in our mouths. There's consevatives that twist the Bible just as much as the liberals do (though there isn't as many). Politics as a whole is corrupt! (Comment this)
"I have come to the conclusion that you are an Islamochristabuddhihindu or in other words, unitarian. God says this about those of you who try to sit on the gate between truth and falsehood:
Revelation 3:16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth."
If you truly believe that corruption is on both sides of the isle, why do you only mention liberals? (Comment this)
To answer your last question, What? If you haven't noticed I've mentioned conservatives that are off too.
Its just that liberals are the ones trying to seperate church and state, they're the ones promoting homo marriages, there the ones supporting abortions and the conservatives are not. Don't get me wrong, I know some liberal GOPers do support that stuff but true conservatives are against it. (Comment this)