The Crusader Empire

 What do we do? They are the essence of a rogue nation. They don’t accept anything we say, they keep making Weapons of Mass Destruction. Libs, admit it, they have them. There are different approaches to this task of stopping the threat against us. They are the:

1. The Sanction until we are blue in the face plan

2. The Fight a long drawnout war, making very sure to abide by the Geneva convention plan

3. The Nuke until we are blue in the face plan

4. The Do-Nothing Plan

5. The King Crusader Plan

Plan number one does not work because sanctioning never works. They will not do what we say, they will not abide by treaties, and they will not stop building nukes just because we tell them to.

Plan number two also never works. Vietnam? The Korean War? We tried to win by “holding the line”, just defending, never attacking. (By the way, if you think about it the Korean War never ended. It has been a sixty-year-long ceasefire, and it looks like hot war will begin commencing soon.) We tried to be “nice” and win a war. But guess what? WAR AINT NICE!

Plan number three has been suggested to me by more than one person. This sounds good to some conservatives at first, but nuking is not needed as of yet, and hopefully wont be needed. The reasons I don’t support this type of attack are:

A. How does this look: North Korea, I’m sorry, you can’t have nukes. If you do we will nuke you.

B. China may be their ally, if this is so, nuking could start a war with China, which at the moment we are not ready for.

C. WE DON’T NEED TO USE NUKES! Tons of conventional bombing is better. In WWII, although we dropped a lot more than two fire bombs,  they did way more damage to Japanese cities.

D. There is that pesky nuclear radiation thingy…

There is one plan that does not deserve mentioning, but some hold it, so i must acknowledge it. The Do-Nothing Plan. If we just wait around, we will be having nukes on in our cities, and North Korea will get the first and last laugh.

The last and best hope is the King Crusader Plan. I am not saying that I originated this plan or that I am the only one with it. I know many others who would agree with me, who also helped formulate it. It is called the King Crusader Plan because I couldn’t think of a good name, but if you want to call it something else go ahead. If war is unavoidable, which it seems to be, we should begin this plan.

Step 1:

Defend Japan, South Korea, and the DMZ with Anti-air missiles to increase our chances of blowing up th North Korean nukes. 

Step 2:

Get all the Japanese “police force” and the South Korean Army together with our troops that are over there already. Mount up for an attack.

Step 3:

Get any allied navies together in the area and blockade North Korea.

Step 4:

In conjunction with the South Korean Airforce, bomb (not with nukes), bomb, and bomb until the major cities and bases of North Korea are dust.

Step 5:

Once North Korea is crippled, then and only then should we send in the troops. Take over North Korea.

Step 6:

South Korea and Japan shall determine the postwar plan, it is in their jurisdiction, and they were the ones mostly threatened by NK’s buildup of nukes. We can finally leave the DMZ. (*cough* Truman’s fault)

There you have it. Of course China muddles up things a bit, if they allied with us it would be all too easy, but if they allied with North Korea we’d have a bigger problem on our hands. We shall see. But remember, we can never think of using the Do-Nothing Plan, so it may be (unfortunately), a risk we have to take.

King Crusader, signing off.

The title of this post is the question that keeps coming up, where are the weapons of mass destruction? Were there really any? If you have half a brain you know that yes there were weapons of mass destruction. Just ask the Kurds. In this post I am going to prove that 1. there are WMD’s and 2. where they are right at this very moment. I will have some help however from 1. a Lebanese journalism agency and 2. the former Iraqi republican guard general 2nd in command behind Soddam himself! My word will be in grey and any other will be in red.

The first will be from General Georges Sada a former general of the Iraqi rebublican guard and 2nd in command to Saddam had a sit down interview with the The New York Sun. If you would like to see proof of this interview go to nysun.com. (because of size the interview has been broken into portions)

“There are WMD gone out of Iraq to Syria and they must be found and returned to safe hands” Mr. Sada said. “I am confident they were taken over.”

Mr. Sada, 65, that the pilots of the two airlines that transported the WMD’s to Syria approached him in the middle of 2004, after Saddam was captured by American troops. The pilots told Mr. Sada that two Iraqi Airways boeings were converted to cargo planes by taking out the seats, Mr. Sada said. Then Special Republican Guard brigades loaded materials onto the planes, he said, including “yellow barrels with skull and crossbones on each barrel.” The pilots said there was also a ground convoy of trucks.

The flights- 56 in total, Mr. Sada said- attracted little notice because they were thought to be civilian flights providing relief from Iraq to Syria, which had suffered a flood after a dam collapse in June of 2002.

“Saddam realized, this time, that the Americans were coming,” Mr. Sada said. “They handed over the WMD’s to the Syrians.”

Mr. Sada said that the Iraqi official responsible for transferring the weapons was a cousin of Saddam Husseins named Ali Hussein al-Majid, known as “Chemical Ali”. The Syrian official responsible for recieving them was a cousin of Bashaar Assad who is known variously as General Abu Ali, Abu Himma, or Zulhimawe.

I thinkI’ve heard that name before, “Chemical Ali”. Ring any bells? The next statement is for you liberal troop haters that think we are oppressers!

He thanked the American troops. “They liberated this country and the nation. It is a liberation force. They did a great job”, he said. “We are freed.”

Sada has a book called Saddam’s Secrets and in this book he states,

On the eve of the first Gulf War, Saddam was planning to use his air force to launch a chemical weopans attack on Israel.

Syria is one of only eight countries that has not signed the Chemical Weopans Convention, a treaty that obligates countries not to stockpile or the use of chemical weopons. Syria’s chemical warfare program, apart from any weopans that may have been recieved from Iraq, has long been the source concern of America, Israel, and Lebanon. In March 2004 the director of the Central Intelligence, George Tenet, testified before the Senate Armed Services Commitee, saying, “Damascus has an active CW development and testing program that relies on foreign suppliers for key controlled chemicals suitable for CW.”

Mr. Sada is now a converted Muslim to Christianity and is the head of operations with the humanitarian organization, Word Compassion, in the Iraqi division.

I sure hope that was proof enough of WMD’s. Liberals you are right that they are not in Iraq because they are in Syria! Why do you think the gates of Baghdad closed shut every time the UN tried to investigate? Do you think Hussein just wanted some nap time?

The next proof of WMD’s in Syria is from Nizar Nayuf, a Syrian journalist who recently defected from Syria to westren Europe and is known for bravely chanllenging the Syrian regime, said in a letter to a Dutch newspaper on Monday, January the 5th. He told the newspaper “De Telegraaf”, that he knows of three sites where Iraq’s WMD’s are kept. The three places are: (my words in greyall other in blue)

1. Tunnels dug under the town of al- Baida near the city of Hama in Northeren Syria. These tunnels are an integral part of an underground factory, built by the North Koreans, for producing Syrian scud missiles. Iraqi chemical weopans and long- ranged missiles are stored in these tunnels.

2. The village of Tal Snan, north of the town of Salamija, where there is a big Syrian air force camp. Vital parts of the WMD’s are stored there.

3. The city of Sjinsjar on the Syrian border with Lebanon, south of Homs city.

Nayouf writes that the transfer of weopans was organized by the commanders of the Republican Guard, including General Shalish with the help of Assif Shoakat the cousin of Bashar Assad. Shoakat is the CEO of Bhaha an import/export company owned by the Assad family.

In February of 2003 just before the American invasion in Iraq, very few are aware of the efforts to bring WMD’s into Syria, and the personal involvement of Bashar Asaad and his family operations.

Nizar wrote to an anonymous Syrian source that wrote letters to him disclosing the WMD locations. Because of size I will not post the letters but please take a second and Go to http://www.2la.org/syria/iraq-wmd.php
to read Nayouf’s letters and to see a Satellite photo of where the locations are.

There are WMD’s and Syria is a very dangerous threat! We need to be very worried about them and what they could do. We know that Hezbollah and Syria have tight relationships (see UN security resolution 1559) and Hezbollah could very well have some of these weopons by now. How do you think Hezbollah had those devastating scud missiles that they fired at Israel. They got them from Syria. Syria is threat not because of they themselves using the WMD’s but they harbor and will supply terrorists!

As general Sada put it our boys are liberators my friends and we need to support them in every way. The worst thing Bush ever did was lie about that there were no WMD’s on false intelligence. That was where President Bush lied. There where and there are WMD’s and he knew it but the Democrat pit bulls wouldn’t stop biting until he said that and guess what they’re still biting!

We need to take a stand! Liberals you need to join us or get out of the way!

Big Jimmy

P.S. Redefeat Communism in 2008, vote against Hillary!

The following post is about the UN and their failing “attempts” to try and control Hezbollah. This post should make you ask the question, who does the UN support? These facts are from the UN regarding the UN security council resolution 1559. My words following the resolution facts will be in red.

On September 2, 2004, the UN Security Council adopted UN Security Council Resolution 1559, coauthored by France and the United States. Echoing the Taif Agreement, the resolution “calls upon all remaining foreign forces to withdraw from Lebanon” and “for the disbanding and disarmament of all Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias.” Lebanon has requested that Israel withdraw from the disputed Shebaa Farms and the hills of Kfar-Shouba and return the Lebanese detainees in Israel as a condition for fully implementing Resolution 1559 which includes disbanding of the military wing of Hezbollah^[1][2][3]. Critics of the resolution argue however that an attempt from the weak and politically divided Lebanese army to disarm Hezbollah would be very difficult and could restart the Lebanese civil war. Syria was also in violation of the resolution until recently because of their military presence in Lebanon.

On October 7, 2004 the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan reported to the Security Council regarding the lack of compliance with Resolution 1559. Mr. Annan concluded his report by saying: “It is time, 14 years after the end of hostilities and four years after the Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, for all parties concerned to set aside the remaining vestiges of the past. The withdrawal of foreign forces and the disbandment and disarmament of militias would, with finality, end that sad chapter of Lebanese history.”^[4]

On January 28, 2005 UN Security Council Resolution 1583 called upon the Government of Lebanon to fully extend and exercise its sole and effective authority throughout the south, including through the deployment of sufficient numbers of Lebanese armed and security forces, to ensure a calm environment throughout the area, including along the Blue Line, and to exert control over the use of force on its territory and from it.

On April 26, 2005, after 29 years of military action in Lebanon, the last Syrian troops left Lebanon. Syrian military and intelligence facilities, after the destruction of sensitive documents or the transportation of logistical material, were turned over to Lebanese counterparts. This action left the Lebanese government as the main violator of the resolution due to its refusal to dismantle the pro-Syrian Palestinian and Hezbollah militias.

On December 27, 2005 Katyusha rockets fired from Hezbollah territory smashed into houses in the Israeli city of Kiryat Shmona wounding three people [5]. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan called on the Lebanese government “to extend its control over all its territory, to exert its monopoly on the use of force, and to put an end to all such attacks”

On January 23, 2006 the UN Security Council called on the Government of Lebanon to make more progress in controlling its territory and disbanding militias, while also calling on Syria to cooperate with those efforts. In a statement read out by its January President, Augustine Mahiga of Tanzania, the Council also called on Syria to take measures to stop movements of arms and personnel into Lebanon.^[7]

The following is the Lebanese response

The Lebanese government has officially responded to this resolution. It is posted on the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) official website ([7]). It has responded in three ways to the resolution:

1. The withdrawal of the foreign forces from Lebanon;
2. Disarming the Lebanese and foreign guerillas; and
3. Expanding the government’s authority on all the Lebanese territories.

Thank you UN for doing absolutely nothing! Have foreign forces been removed: Israel yes, Syria yes but still shipping arms to Lebanon. I wonder how Hezbollah got those missles that no other militia group has yet? Have any guerillas been disarmed: NO! The Hezbollah is alive and well and controlling the Lebanese gov’t. Hezbollah actually has leaders in the Lebanese gov’t. Lebanon supports Hezbollah people, they are one and the same! The Lebanese gov’t harbors terrorists! And Syria not only harbors terrorists but helps give them arms!

Now I wonder why the UN really doesn’t give a crap if the Hezbollah is still around. Could it be that their trying to win the Islamofacists to their side to create a one world order at the expense of Israel and the US! Why should the UN care about Israel! There only the size of New Jersey and there are million times more Muslims to make happy than Jews. For heavens sake why should they exist if theres more Jews in NYC than in Israel itself!

I’ll tell you why because Israel is a friend of the US, Israel is against Terrorism, Israel stands for whats right, Israel is always attacked before they attack because of the situation the UN has put them in. If they attack all hell breaks loose! When Hezbollah attacks its just another problem with the Middle East. Its not right when school buses with little children is being bombed, its not right when someone blows an explosive on their bodies in a city square. Those are terrorists and thats what the Muslims and the UN support. Dont believe me? Check out the following pictures:

 UN flag right next to Hezbollah flag at UN base.

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan shaking hands with Hezbollah leader!

People, if we are completely against terrorist organizations then why are we supporting the UN? 

Big Jimmy