The Crusader Empire

The following post is about the UN and their failing “attempts” to try and control Hezbollah. This post should make you ask the question, who does the UN support? These facts are from the UN regarding the UN security council resolution 1559. My words following the resolution facts will be in red.

On September 2, 2004, the UN Security Council adopted UN Security Council Resolution 1559, coauthored by France and the United States. Echoing the Taif Agreement, the resolution “calls upon all remaining foreign forces to withdraw from Lebanon” and “for the disbanding and disarmament of all Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias.” Lebanon has requested that Israel withdraw from the disputed Shebaa Farms and the hills of Kfar-Shouba and return the Lebanese detainees in Israel as a condition for fully implementing Resolution 1559 which includes disbanding of the military wing of Hezbollah^[1][2][3]. Critics of the resolution argue however that an attempt from the weak and politically divided Lebanese army to disarm Hezbollah would be very difficult and could restart the Lebanese civil war. Syria was also in violation of the resolution until recently because of their military presence in Lebanon.

On October 7, 2004 the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan reported to the Security Council regarding the lack of compliance with Resolution 1559. Mr. Annan concluded his report by saying: “It is time, 14 years after the end of hostilities and four years after the Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, for all parties concerned to set aside the remaining vestiges of the past. The withdrawal of foreign forces and the disbandment and disarmament of militias would, with finality, end that sad chapter of Lebanese history.”^[4]

On January 28, 2005 UN Security Council Resolution 1583 called upon the Government of Lebanon to fully extend and exercise its sole and effective authority throughout the south, including through the deployment of sufficient numbers of Lebanese armed and security forces, to ensure a calm environment throughout the area, including along the Blue Line, and to exert control over the use of force on its territory and from it.

On April 26, 2005, after 29 years of military action in Lebanon, the last Syrian troops left Lebanon. Syrian military and intelligence facilities, after the destruction of sensitive documents or the transportation of logistical material, were turned over to Lebanese counterparts. This action left the Lebanese government as the main violator of the resolution due to its refusal to dismantle the pro-Syrian Palestinian and Hezbollah militias.

On December 27, 2005 Katyusha rockets fired from Hezbollah territory smashed into houses in the Israeli city of Kiryat Shmona wounding three people [5]. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan called on the Lebanese government “to extend its control over all its territory, to exert its monopoly on the use of force, and to put an end to all such attacks”

On January 23, 2006 the UN Security Council called on the Government of Lebanon to make more progress in controlling its territory and disbanding militias, while also calling on Syria to cooperate with those efforts. In a statement read out by its January President, Augustine Mahiga of Tanzania, the Council also called on Syria to take measures to stop movements of arms and personnel into Lebanon.^[7]

The following is the Lebanese response

The Lebanese government has officially responded to this resolution. It is posted on the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) official website ([7]). It has responded in three ways to the resolution:

1. The withdrawal of the foreign forces from Lebanon;
2. Disarming the Lebanese and foreign guerillas; and
3. Expanding the government’s authority on all the Lebanese territories.

Thank you UN for doing absolutely nothing! Have foreign forces been removed: Israel yes, Syria yes but still shipping arms to Lebanon. I wonder how Hezbollah got those missles that no other militia group has yet? Have any guerillas been disarmed: NO! The Hezbollah is alive and well and controlling the Lebanese gov’t. Hezbollah actually has leaders in the Lebanese gov’t. Lebanon supports Hezbollah people, they are one and the same! The Lebanese gov’t harbors terrorists! And Syria not only harbors terrorists but helps give them arms!

Now I wonder why the UN really doesn’t give a crap if the Hezbollah is still around. Could it be that their trying to win the Islamofacists to their side to create a one world order at the expense of Israel and the US! Why should the UN care about Israel! There only the size of New Jersey and there are million times more Muslims to make happy than Jews. For heavens sake why should they exist if theres more Jews in NYC than in Israel itself!

I’ll tell you why because Israel is a friend of the US, Israel is against Terrorism, Israel stands for whats right, Israel is always attacked before they attack because of the situation the UN has put them in. If they attack all hell breaks loose! When Hezbollah attacks its just another problem with the Middle East. Its not right when school buses with little children is being bombed, its not right when someone blows an explosive on their bodies in a city square. Those are terrorists and thats what the Muslims and the UN support. Dont believe me? Check out the following pictures:

 UN flag right next to Hezbollah flag at UN base.

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan shaking hands with Hezbollah leader!

People, if we are completely against terrorist organizations then why are we supporting the UN? 

Big Jimmy 

I hate the UN. The UN should be moved to Paris, and let the French have it. The UN is an interesting organization though, in a way. The UN though it is founded by the US, funded by the US, armed by the US, and in the US, seeks to destroy the soveriegnty that created it. You know, the UN uses the American troops almost more than we do. According to James F. Dunnigan, in his book How to Make War,

“From 1956 to 1992, US foreign troops were sent into foriegn nations 51 times. About 1.4 interventions a year. Since 1992, we have also gone in 51 times, about 6.5 times a year. That’s a nearly fivefold increase. A THIRD of American armed forces are currently tied up with peacekeeping missions, even more if you include the half century old Korean “police action”. But so often are US troops called on, usually at the behest of the United Nations, that you now have the American Army referred to as “UN troops”.” [emphasis mine]

UN TROOPS!?! Heck no, they are our men, from America, our American Army, our American Marines. Screw the UN! These countries that have a civil war every two minutes, screw them too. We shouldn’t have to cover every body all the time. And the libs wonder why we are spread so thin. Lets adhere to the Monroe doctrine, and not the doctrine of the UN. The main points of the Monroe Doctrine, according to wikipedia, are:

” First, it conveys that European countries cannot colonize in any of the Americas: North, Central, or South. Second, it enforces Washington’s rule of foreign policy, in which the U.S. will only be involved in European affairs if America’s rights are disturbed. Third, the U.S. will consider any attempt at colonization a threat to its national security. [Teddy! not frankie] Roosevelt added to the doctrine, and summed up his additions with the statement, “Speak softly and carry a big stick.”"

Roosevelt had his corallary, so here’s mine to make this doctrine even better. The King Crusader Corollary:

“If any nation threatens us or any nation on our hemisphere, we’ll take you out.”

Boom. The End. Isolationism at its finest. If Islamabad has a civil war Europe, your problem, you wanna use the UN or EU or some other crap, go for it. But Iran threatened us. North Korea threatened us. Let’s take em out. We don’t need the UN. The UN is a cramp in our style. I’m not saying we should blow off relation with all other nations, just the thing that Frankie created. A quick three reasons why the UN sucks:

1. Tyrant nations like Iran are allowed to be in it. Commis are allowed to members of the permanent security council. The Soviet Union vetoed and China vetos everything we try to do.

2. The UN [and our own lib politicians] screw us up in war. When the going gets tough, the libs start running.

3. We give the most most forces, and the most money, but we have no extra say in what our men are doing over there. Everybody says “Bush, why didn’t you wait for the UN? ” If he did the war would be on our soil right about now.

We need to talk with other nations, but their advice should NEVER run our country.

King Crusader, signing out.